Abstract Objective: In this study, a comparative evaluation of the physicochemical properties of Cention N and other direct restorative materials was performed. Three restorative materials—a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC), an alkasite-based resinous material (Cention N), and a resin composite (Tetric N Ceram)—were characterized in terms of degree of conversion, Knoop hardness number (KHN) ratio, flexural strength, elastic modulus, water sorption, water solubility, microshear bond strength to dentin, immediate microleakage, and radiopacity. Methodology: The microshear bond strength to dentin and microleakage of Cention N were evaluated with and without the application of an adhesive system (Tetric N Bond Universal). A one-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the data in terms of degree of conversion, KHN ratio, water sorption, water solubility, microshear bond strength to dentin, and radiopacity. A two-way ANOVA test (carried out considering the material type and ethanol aging as factors) was used to analyze the data in terms of flexural strength and elastic modulus. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to statistically analyze the data on microleakage. A significance level of α=0.05 was used for all tests. Results: Fuji II LC was found to have the highest degree of conversion, water sorption, and microleakage, as well as the lowest flexural strength. Cention N had the highest solubility; when used with an adhesive system, it achieved bond strength and microleakage similar to those of the Tetric N Ceram composite. Tetric N Ceram had the highest degree of conversion, KHN ratio, and radiopacity. Conclusion: The properties of Cention N validate its efficacy as an alternative direct restorative material when used in conjunction with an adhesive system.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Differences in the mechanical properties of ceramic and resin-based materials pose the question of which of the two will perform better in the long run. Objectives: Evaluate the flexural resistance and color stability of different indirect esthetic restorative materials. Methods: The materials selected were Filtek™ Z250 XT (3M ESPE), Ceramage (SHOFU Dental), VITA VM® LC and VITA ENAMIC® (VITA Zahnfabrik), IPS e.max® (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Zolid FX (Amann Girrbach AG). The flexural resistance assay (n = 10) was conducted in a universal mechanical testing machine. Color readings (n = 5) were taken with a VITA Easyshade V® spectrophotometer. Results: All-ceramic materials had better mechanical performance (p < 0.001). Color stability results show that Ceramage, IPS e.max® and Zolid FX displayed a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.002) with respect to Filtek Z250 XT, VITA VM® LC and VITA ENAMIC®. Conclusions: All-ceramic materials exhibited greater flexural resistance and color stability than polymer-based materials. However, indirect esthetic materials with polymers in their composition, such as Ceramage, are presented as a valid alternative, due to their appropriate mechanical properties and their color stability, which is similar to that of ceramic materials.

RESUMEN Introducción: Las diferencias en las propiedades mecánicas de los materiales cerámicos y a base de resina plantean la interrogante sobre cuál puede tener un mejor desempeño a largo plazo. Objetivos: Evaluar la resistencia flexural y estabilidad de color de diferentes materiales restauradores estéticos indirectos. Métodos: Los materiales seleccionados fueron Filtek™ Z250 XT (3M ESPE), Ceramage (SHOFU Dental), VITA VM® LC y VITA ENAMIC® (VITA Zahnfabrik), IPS e.max® (Ivoclar-Vivadent) y Zolid FX (Amann Girrbach AG). El ensayo de resistencia flexural (n = 10) fue realizado en una máquina universal de ensayos mecánicos. Las lecturas de color (n = 5) se midieron en un espectrofotómetro VITA Easyshade V®. Resultados: Los materiales totalmente cerámicos mostraron un mejor desempeño mecánico (p < 0,001). Los resultados de estabilidad de color muestran que Ceramage, IPS e.max® y Zolid FX, mostraron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p ≤ 0,002) con Filtek Z250 XT, VITA VM® LC y VITA ENAMIC®. Conclusiones: Los materiales totalmente cerámicos presentaron una mayor resistencia flexural y estabilidad de color que los materiales de base polimérica. A pesar de ello, los materiales estéticos indirectos con polímeros en su composición, como Ceramage, se presentan como una alternativa válida, ya que además de tener propiedades mecánicas adecuadas, poseen una estabilidad de color semejante a los materiales cerámicos.

Introduction. The differences in the mechanical properties of ceramic and resin-based materials raise the question of which material can perform better in the long run. Objectives. Evaluate the flexural strength and color stability of different indirect aesthetic restorative materials. Methods. The selected materials were Filtek™ Z250 XT (3M ESPE), Ceramage (SHOFU Dental), VITA VM®LC y VITA ENAMIC® (VITA Zahnfabrik), IPS e.max® (Ivoclar-Vivadent) y Zolid FX (Amann Girrbach AG). The Flexural Strength test (n = 10) was carried out, using a mechanical testing machine. Color readings (n = 5) were measured using a VITA Easyshade V® spectrophotometer. Results. All ceramic materials showed better mechanical performance (p&lt; 0,001). The color stability results show that Ceramage, IPS e.max® and Zolid FX, showed a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.002) with Filtek Z250 XT, VITA VM®LC and VITA ENAMIC®. Conclusions. Some indirect aesthetic materials with polymers in their composition are presented as a valid alternative for indirect restorations, presenting acceptable mechanical performance and colorimetric stability.

Introducción: Las diferencias en las propiedades mecánicas de los materiales cerámicos y a base de resina plantean la interrogante de qué material puede tener un mejor desempeño a largo plazo. Objetivos. Evaluar la resistencia flexural y estabilidad de color de diferentes materiales restauradores estéticos indirectos. Métodos. Los materiales seleccionados fueron Filtek™ Z250 XT (3M ESPE), Ceramage (SHOFU Dental), VITA VM®LC y VITA ENAMIC® (VITA Zahnfabrik), IPS e.max® (Ivoclar-Vivadent) y Zolid FX (Amann Girrbach AG). El ensayo de Resistencia Flexural (n=10) fue realizado en  una máquina universal de ensayos mecánicos. Las lecturas de color (n=5) se midieron en un espectrofotómetro VITA Easyshade V®. Resultados. Los materiales totalmente cerámicos mostraron un mejor desempeño mecánico (p &lt; 0,001). Los resultados de estabilidad de color muestran que Ceramage, IPS e.max® y Zolid FX, mostraron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (p ≤ 0,002) con Filtek Z250 XT, VITA VM®LC y VITA ENAMIC®. Conclusiones. Los resultados del presente trabajo muestran que los materiales totalmente cerámicos presentaron una mayor resistencia flexural y estabilidad de color que los materiales de base polimérica.

Resumen: Recientes publicaciones plantean la posible asociación del cannabis (Cannabis sativa) con el desarrollo de la periodontitis. Objetivo: Analizar la influencia del consumo de cannabis en la enfermedad periodontal, relevando la evidencia disponible e identificando las variables asociadas en los estudios . Material y método: se realizó una Scoping Review a partir de una búsqueda estructurada en PubMed/ MEDLINE, Science Direct, LILACS, SciELO hasta mayo de 2017 . Resultados: Estudios “In vivo” mostraron una mayor pérdida ósea en animales expuestos a Cannabis. Los casos clínicos muestran que el uso crónico de cannabis puede resultar en agrandamientos gingivales y periodontitis crónica severa localizada. Los estudios epidemiológicos demuestran una asociación estadística entre Cannabis y periodontitis. Conclusiones: El consumo del Cannabis parece estar asociado con una mayor presencia de periodontitis. Sin embargo, se desconoce el mecanismo específico por el cual actúa en los tejidos gingivales.

Abstract: Recent publications suggest the possible association between cannabis (Cannabis sativa) and periodontitis. Objective : To analyze the possible influence of cannabis use on periodontal disease, highlighting the available evidence and identifying the associated variables in the studies. Materials and methods : We conducted a scoping review applying a structured search method in PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, LILACS, SciELO including publications until May 2017. Results : In vivo studies showed greater bone loss in animals exposed to cannabis. Clinical cases show that chronic cannabis use may result in gingival enlargement (with clinical features similar to phenytoin induced enlargement) and localized severe chronic periodontitis. Most of the epidemiological studies confirmed the possible association between cannabis and periodontitis. Conclusions : The consumption of cannabis seems to be associated with a greater presence of periodontitis. However, the specific mechanism by which cannabis acts in the gingival tissues is unknown.